2 things

Oct. 21st, 2004 06:51 am
quesarah: (Default)
[personal profile] quesarah
1.
Wed Oct 20, 2:07 PM ET

Science - Reuters

By Patricia Reaney

LONDON (Reuters) - A more refined analysis of the human genome, or book of life, shows people have fewer genes than previously thought, an international team of scientists said on Wednesday.

Instead of 100,000 genes, the initial estimate, scientists working on the Human Genome Project (news - web sites), a publicly funded collaboration of scientists from 20 institutions in the United States, Europe and Asia, have reduced the number to 20,000-25,000.

"Only a decade ago, most scientists thought humans had about 100,000 genes. When we analyzed the working draft of the human genome sequence three years ago, we estimated there were about 30,000 to 35,000 genes, which surprised many," said Francis Collins, the director of the US National Human Genome Research Institute in Bethesda, Maryland.

"This new analysis reduces that number even further and provides us with the clearest picture yet of our genome," he added in a statement.

By identifying genes in humans and what they do, scientists hope to accelerate the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and to find preventions and cures.

Ultimately researchers hope to compile a complete list of all human genes and their related proteins to aid scientists in biomedical research.

"It's important to let people know that there is an even better reference sequence out there for the human genome," Dr Jane Rogers, head of sequencing at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in England, which worked on the project, said in an interview.

The refined sequence reported in the science journal Nature is the most complete so far. It covers 99 percent of the gene-containing parts of the human genome, identifies 99.7 percent of known genes and is 99.9 percent accurate, according to the scientists.

Because it is so complete it will allow scientists to search for the causes of disease and inheritable factors that predispose people to illnesses such as diabetes or cancers.

Scientists also expect it to advance drug development by customizing treatments to genetic profiles.

The refined sequence identifies the birth of 1,183 genes in the last 60-100 million years and the death of about 30 genes in a similar period.

Rogers said now that researchers had a refined sequence of the human genome they needed to learn more about how genes are regulated and used.

2. Go Sox!!

Date: 2004-10-21 07:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] virginmartyr1.livejournal.com
1. oo snazzy

2. yay sox!! baseball's really not my thing, but i felt bad for the sox, and since i got sucked into watching the sunday night game (that didn't end until after 1:30 EST), i somehow was rooting for the little guys.

3. you're sick again??!! no being sick. you've been there, done that. doesn't your body understand? rest up and feel better. :o)

Date: 2004-10-21 08:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] biogeekgrrl.livejournal.com
1. indeed!

2. i watched games 4 & 5 with my family. it's what we do to bond, we watch sports.

3. yes, i'm sick or something. my sinuses aren't happy at all. :(

Date: 2004-10-21 08:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] virginmartyr1.livejournal.com
3. ugh. your sinuses are rebelling from all the changes in air pressure. are you home sick sick or just suffering through it sick? maybe your sinuses need chocolate?

Date: 2004-10-21 08:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] biogeekgrrl.livejournal.com
3. suffering through it sick, but perfectly willing to go home early. i think chicken soup is in order. where's a bubbe when i need one??

Date: 2004-10-21 09:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] king-ghidorah.livejournal.com
1. I understand going from 30,000 to 20,000, but how does one overcount by 80,000 when sequencing genes? Seems like somebody needed to check their algorithms....

2. Woo!

Date: 2004-10-21 10:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] biogeekgrrl.livejournal.com
1. It's probably due to their estimated average gene length, and how much DNA they assumed would be noncoding versus coding.

2. w00t! My family is pleased. :)

Date: 2004-10-21 09:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] woe2you.livejournal.com
I know, I'd swear I put a black pair and a blue pair in the wash the other day, but only got a blue pair back...

Date: 2004-10-21 10:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] biogeekgrrl.livejournal.com
The black pair ran off with the eversosexxeh red socks.

Date: 2004-10-21 09:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joebanks.livejournal.com
2.If they gone on to win the series; the world will be out of balance.

And it will cut two ways in Cleveland. On the one hand we will be saying "alright now it's our turn!" On the other, even though it's been half a century since we've won "the series" at least we could always look at
Boston for consolation.

Date: 2004-10-21 10:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] biogeekgrrl.livejournal.com
True. Of course, the cosmos is already out of alignment after the ALCS. And wouldn't it be nice to see Cleveland in the World Series? ::sigh::

Profile

quesarah: (Default)
Intercourse, the penguin

January 2013

S M T W T F S
  123 45
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 29th, 2025 04:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios