(no subject)
Jan. 3rd, 2004 10:26 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
We saw it yesterday and I give it a hearty "not bad." There was some good epic battle stuff; Viggo and Sean were outstanding; Eowyn was kick-ass; and Legolas and Gimli warmed my cold nasty heart.
There was some not so good stuff: what was the point of having Arwen in there; some of the CGI sucked; I wanted to throttle Elijah by the first third of the movie; Karl Urban grimaced and did weird eyebrow thingies too much for my liking (he was much better as Caeser in Xena); the final 30-45 minutes of the movie needed to be hacked off.
Also, Frodo and Sam: gay much?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-04 06:21 pm (UTC)Traquilizer gun
Date: 2004-01-04 06:53 pm (UTC)Sam and Frodo seem just as gay in the book... maybe more so.
Date: 2004-01-04 06:25 pm (UTC)By the way, the wind-down in the movie is still much less prolonged than the book. In the book, there is a whole section where they find the Shire occupied by a strange new boss who has started factories and pollution, a human who calls himself "Sharky". They the hobbits have to retake the Shire. Then everyone says goodbye. RotK is the shortest book of the trilogy, but it feels longer....
JRRT would have been disappointed at the loss of the cleansing of the Shire, but I think all but the total JRRT nuts should be glad it went away.
Sam+Frodo 4-EVA!
Date: 2004-01-04 08:48 pm (UTC)Then they wuss out and have Frodo kiss him on the forehead. Come on people, we know a romantic setup when we see it. Deliver or don't bother.
I'm glad they cut the cleansing of the Shire. The ending really was too long for dramatic purposes.
Re: Sam+Frodo 4-EVA!
Date: 2004-01-04 09:55 pm (UTC)Re: Sam+Frodo 4-EVA!
Date: 2004-01-04 10:54 pm (UTC)The audience I was in didn't clap until the appropriate time, but there was some fidgeting. And a toddler, as T has mentioned.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 09:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 09:30 am (UTC)